Winsome

Could you make this in US Letter size?

This is really neat.

I may use it for my next Solo RPG, after I finish my Troika one.

Will creating Assets of our own hurt the balancing of the game?

I original downloaded Winsome in Oct 2021 (based on the file date) and there was a bit that I wasn't sure on. I just redownloaded the current version to see if the there was any adjustment to it, but seems not. 

In the first paragraph  (of the readable file at least) it says the Ironsworn rules were reduced to 2. But reading through it, all I see is Risk as a move. I assumed the Resolve segment was just further explanation for following through with Risk.  Ie. "making the roll then follow through with the outcome" is a completed move in terms of Ironsworn's moves. 

In Winsome's case should I be approaching this as Risk and Resolve as two separate moves or should I treat them together as only one?

When you say mark 4 progress for tricky, is it four boxes or four ticks in the box?

Same goes for difficult, tough or impressive. Are you filling whole boxes or ticks in the box like in traditional IS?

I found that losing resources on every single weak hit is very punishing (compared to e.g. Ironsworn where you often just gain momentum).

a very cool system! I love a lot of the abstractions you made.

Particularly having titles as standard (I didnt even know they were in ironsworn) which I'm guessing it will probably work great with younger players too. Giving them tangible motivation to be creative in how to apply their titles' bonuses to the given situation.

One thing I found a bit weird is the "Friendship", not because any of your flavor text doesnt make sense, but because I would probably make it a bit more inclusive, after all, not only friendships make for good/worthwhile memories.

The other is that the oracle gives only yes/no answers without any degree of severity, e.g. a ", and…" or ", but…". I found that this tended to slow down the fiction quite a bit, so I added in a d10 witha 1-2 meaning "and", a 3-5 meaning "but" and 6-10 being normal yes/no results, though I'm still fiddling with these chances.

Another thing I added was that if the d6 and the d10 were equal, that meant that the presupposition the question was based on was in some way incorrect, which made for interesting twists in adventures.

anyways, thanks for this great system :)

What a great idea!
I have been playing a toned down version of ironsworn for a while and I am very glad I stumbled upon this.

Only reduction will address is the lack of progress rolls. I find the possibility of ending a quest/fight/whatever early, but at a big risk too appealing.

I'm mostly writing this above part to seem less like a pendant when saying this: the second line under "Fiendship" in the English print version has a typo.

Great! I like the change of wording to approaches/methods, and the progression of Luck > Wealth > Happiness > Health. As well as making it setting agnostic via the titles. You fail to explain the XP track though.

I tried running Winsome yesterday and found myself confused by this note under the Risk heading:

Add +1 to a relevant resource (or luck) for each time your chance exceeds a fate, then Resolve the outcome & lose -1 for anytime your chance was matched or beaten by a fate. 

I'm not sure I understand. If I roll a Weak Hit (chance die exceeds one fate die but is beaten by the second), do I add +1 to a resource, subtract -1 to a resource, or add nothing as my chance both exceeded and was beaten by one die?

Could you please clarify what is this game's status under Creative Commons? From this page, it appears licensed under a CC-BY (as it is based on the CC-BY Ironsworn SRD). In the file itself, on the other hand, the attribution text states that it is based on the CC-BY-NC-SA Ironsworn game, while providing no information on the Winsome license itself.

Seriously great stuff here! Super portable Ironsworn. One thing what is the role of titles in the game?